“For A’ That”: Singing the Anthem of Equality

When the newly re-established Scottish Parliament convened in 1999, it opened symbolically with a Scottish air written over two centuries earlier by Robert Burns: “A Man’s a Man for A’ That” ([1795], Scottish Poetry Library). Sung by Sheela Wellington, the inaugural performance was more than a nod to tradition: it was a declaration of intent (BBC News). By choosing Burns’ egalitarian ballad, the Parliament aligned itself with a vision of national identity rooted not in inherited privilege but in the common dignity of “m[e]n o’ independent mind.” The poem’s true power lies in its form: with musical repetition and a vernacular voice, Burns democratizes poetry, crafting a song that asks to be memorized, sung, and shared, a song that belongs not to the princes but to the people. Its structure reinforces its meaning: true nobility lies in “worth,” and belongs to the voice proclaiming that it should echo through fields, taverns, and even in the halls of government.

​

At the heart of the poem lies its insistent refrain: “A man’s a man for a’ that.” The phrase concludes the first stanza and reverberates through the piece like a chorus: “For a’ that, and a’ that, / Their tinsel show, and a’ that.” It functions as a rallying cry, stripping away pretenses – “tinsel show” – to reveal intrinsic human worth. By anchoring each stanza with this phrase, Burns ensures the message is not only memorable but communal, as if meant to be shouted in unison. The language is intentionally plainspoken and rhythmic; “a’ that” becomes a kind of verbal drumbeat. Burns doesn’t so much argue his point as chant it, with a conviction that settles into the reader’s bones. Through repetition the poem opens its voice to the collective: its words become communal property. This isn’t parlor poetry – it’s a working man’s hymn. The spirit endures in modern renditions, such as singer-songwriter Paolo Nutini’s version, which reimagines the poem as a contemporary rock anthem, received with exuberance by a new generation of audiences at his concerts (Nutini).

​

This anthem targets the empty pride of inherited rank and social hierarchy. Burns mocks those who flaunt titles and wealth: “Ye see yon birkie, ca’d a lord, / Wha struts, and stares, and a’ that.” The word “birkie” – a self-important fellow – paired with “struts and stares” evokes a caricature, inflated by rank, but lacking in substance. The poet continues: “A prince can mak a belted knight, / A marquis, duke, and a’ that; / But an honest man’s aboon his might - / Guid faith, he mauna fa’ that!” This is more than critique; it’s a reversal. No prince, however powerful, can confer honesty or independence of mind and conjure it out of nothing. Honesty and free-thinking are intrinsic and hard earned. That kind of worth lies beyond nobility – “aboon his might.” In these verses, Burns elevates moral character above social status. Through deliberate contrasts – between “birkie” and “honest man,” between “tinsel show” and “sense and worth” – the poem redefines true value. Its repeated structure sharpens these oppositions: by placing highborn figures and humble laborers side by side, stanza after stanza, the poem dismantles the myth of aristocratic superiority, with the steady force of a hammer against stone.

​

Another thread in the poem’s fabric is Burn’s quiet but cutting irony – a device he wields to invite his listener to see the world with greater moral clarity. Consider the line: “The rank is but a guinea’s stamp, / the Man’s the gowd for a’ that.” At first, the image gestures toward value: a stamped coin, a mark of currency. But Burns turns that expectation inside out. Rank, like the stamp, is superficial – a mere imprint – while the true gold lies within the man himself. In this light, aristocracy is shown to be a counterfeit: shiny, perhaps, but shallow. Similarly, when he points to the “birkie, ca’d a lord,” who “struts, and stares, and a’ that,” the language is playful, even comical. “Birkie” is almost affectionate – yet the strutting, the staring, the borrowed dignity of title show it to be hollow. Burns doesn’t need to shout. The irony lies in the space between word and world, in the gap between how things appear and what they are. And in that gap, we begin to hear the quiet music of the poem’s deeper truth.

​

What makes this ideological critique even more radical is its delivery in Scots vernacular. Rather than writing in the refined English of the elite, Burns writes in the everyday language of his fellow countrymen: “Wear hoddin grey, an’ a that,” he writes of the honest man, “A man’s a man for a’ that.” This is no mere stylistic flourish – it’s a political stance. The use of Scots signals Burn’s allegiance to a distinct national and cultural identity that resists English imperialism and class hierarchy. Words like “gowd” (gold), “mauna” (must not), and “birkie” root the poem in the rhythm and realities of working-class Scottish life. That linguistic grounding and a meter drawn from folk music give the poem the quality of something oral, collective, and timeless. Burns does more than speak for the working man; he speaks as him, creating a voice to be carried forward in song.

​

This is why the poem endures – not just as text, but as song. After first sharing it in a letter, Burns first submitted it to a political newspaper and then to a publisher of traditional Scottish airs, rather than to a literary journal (The Letters of Robert Burns). From the outset it was political and meant to be sung: passed from voice to voice, amplified from generation to generation. Its form makes it possible. The insistent rhyme and rhythm, the refrain that gathers force with every repetition – these features make it easy to memorize, inviting to chant, and endlessly adaptable. Whether played on bagpipes at a state ceremony or strummed on a guitar by a teenager, the poem calls for participation. Its cadence draws people in, across boundaries of time, class, and geography. In this way, the poem enacts what it proclaims: dignity without pretense, unity across difference. You can hear it performed by children, folk musicians, and opera singers alike. It is not a relic, but a living tradition. Each generation finds its way back to Burns because his work is so performable. It lives on in the shared voices of those who claim it as their own.

​

More than two centuries later, Burns’ vision is still in the making – but that may be precisely its power. The poem does not offer closure, and it does not promise that justice has been achieved; instead, it offers hope and insists that justice is worth pursuing. “Then let us pray that come it may,” he writes in the final stanza, “As come it will for a’ that, / That Sense and Worth o’er a’ the earth / Shall bear the gree, an’ a’ that.” The phrase “bear the gree” – to win the prize – positions Burns not just as a poet of his historical moment, but a prophet of ours. He gives us not an anthem of an already accomplished triumph, but a blueprint for future possibility. It is not enough to observe the world as it is. One must join in this song of justice again and again until its promise is fulfilled. What is more, the very act of singing brings the participant closer to the vision that it lays out: we enact community when we join in the refrain.

​

This invitation to participate is not abstract. Burns built it into the structure of the poem: a chorus meant to be repeated and remembered. Its egalitarian message is inseparable from its form: oral, shared, even populist. Burns doesn’t argue for equality; he assumes a shared humanity that comes true as the song is collectively performed. And that may be Burns’ most radical intervention: to turn poetry into participation. In a world still fractured by inequality, “A Man’s a Man for A’ That” continues to ask something important of us: to listen, to sing, and above all to proclaim that the chorus’ decree must eventually become our shared reality.